Page 4 - Lawtext Environmental Liabilty Journal Example
P. 4

71
                                    [2008] 3  Env. Liability :             The emergence of European Union environmental criminal law – Part I  :  Hedemann-Robinson     7171
                                                                                                               71
                                                                                                               71
                                                            The emergence of European Union

                                                                      environmental criminal law:
                                                        a quest for solid foundations – Part I




                                                                                         Martin Hedemann-Robinson
                                                                            Senior Lecturer in European Law, University of Kent





                                                                                     1
               On 21 May 2008, the European Union’s political institutions  Community treaties,  the Member States as well the
               reached agreement on the contents of a prospective European  political institutions of the Union appeared to subscribe to
               Union (EU) legislative instrument intended to combat  the view that the area of criminal policy remained a matter
               environmental crime. Specifically, after some seven years of  essentially outside the remit of Community law. The
               political negotiations, the Council of the EU and the European  establishment of an intergovernmental framework for the
               Parliament have finally secured political accord on the  development of agreements between Member States on
               provisions of a prospective European Community directive on  promoting certain aspects of police and judicial cooperation
               the protection of the environment law through criminal law.  in criminal matters by virtue of the Treaty on European
               For the first time it appears likely that a supranational legal  Union (TEU) 1992 did not alter the orthodox view that
               instrument will be adopted in 2008 on the subject of criminal  supranational Community measures could not be taken in
               policy. Such a step will be a profound constitutional moment  the field of criminal policy. It was not until the European
               for the EU, given that for much of the time until now the  Court of Justice (ECJ) decided in its famous Environmental
                                                                                    2
               orthodox position has been to deny that the EU possesses legal  Crimes ruling of 2005  that the Community has implied
               competence to enact such measures in a policy area which has  competence under the auspices of the provisions of the EC
               always been regarded as being within the exclusive domain of  Treaty on the Community’s common environmental policy
               individual Member States. The aim of this two-part article is  to enact measures to combat environmental crime. Until
               to provide an analysis of the emergence of EU legislation  the ruling, Member States had fiercely contested the
               intended to combat environmental crime. In particular, it  European Commission’s view that Community legislation
               focuses on the extent to which the EU has provided adequate  on environmental crime could be validly adopted and had
               legal and political justification for the promulgation of  resisted participating in negotiations over an EC legislative
               supranationally adopted legislation. As will become apparent,  text proposed by the Commission in 2001. 3
               the path towards the adoption of such legislation has been  However, in the wake of  Environmental Crimes,
               protracted, controversial, complex and unpredictable.  subsequent judicial guidance from the ECJ and substantial
                  Part I of this article examines the initial phase in the  modification by the Commission of its 2001 legislative
               development of an EU policy on environmental crime,  proposal for a Community directive, the EU’s Member
               specifically until 2000. This phase was dominated by concerns  States governments have radically changed their stance.
               on the part of EU Member States to ensure any agreements  Specifically, they did not block the Council of the EU’s
               over that policy should remain based on an intergovernmental  participation in legislative negotiations and struck a political
               footing, so that European cooperation would be subject to the  agreement on 21 May 2008 with the Council’s legislative
               consent of all Member States. Part II of this article will consider  partner, the European Parliament, over the adoption of a
               the most recent phase of the EU’s development of a policy on  Community measure.  It is anticipated that the EC directive
                                                                                    4
               environmental crime.

                                                                     1  Namely the 1951 European Economic and Steel Community,
                  Introduction                                       1957 European Economic Community Treaty and 1957 European
                                                                     Atomic Energy (Euratom) Treaty. The EEC Treaty was renamed as
               For several years after the entry into force of the treaties  the European Community (EC) Treaty in 1992, by virtue of the
                                                                     Treaty on European Union 1992.
               founding the EU, namely the original three European   2  Case C–176/03 Commission v Council [2005] ECR I-7879.
                                                                     3  COM(2001)139 (13 March 2001).
                                                                     4  As noted in p 13 of the minutes of the 2874th Council Meeting
                                                                     (Environment) (Luxembourg 5 June 2008) (Council Doc 9959/08
                                                                     (Presse 149)).

                                              ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY PUBLISHED BY LAWTEXT PUBLISHING LIMITED
                                                            www.lawtext.com
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9